Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersHow to nominate in 8 simple steps
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
STEP 5
STEP 6
STEP 7
STEP 8
NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you. Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 17:18:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 16:37:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely mood Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 09:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created and uploaded by Vyacheslav Argenberg – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and an almost Raja Ravi Varma-esque scene. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Indeed a nice scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 03:03:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Hemiptera_(True_Bugs)
Info Northern flatid planthopper nymph (Flatormenis proxima) at night. I was out looking for moths (not much success there), but saw a tiny mobile piece of white fluff moving along the stem of a plan. (This cute little guy is just ~4mm long.) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 03:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Note: It looks like there is an existing gallery for planthoppers, but it's for a different family (Fulgoridae -- this is Flatidae). — Rhododendrites talk | 03:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 20:51:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus_:_Vanessa
Info Red admiral (Vanessa atalanta), a little worse for wear on a coneflower. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment File name is bad and ambiguous. Yes, it's mostly used for these butterflies, but for the sake of full clarity I think you could do better. --Cart (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Happy to rename it after the nom (e.g. "Red admiral butterfly in New York (11147).jpg"), or you're welcome to. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll fix it right away. Best to be done with it. --Cart (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Happy to rename it after the nom (e.g. "Red admiral butterfly in New York (11147).jpg"), or you're welcome to. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A little bit of a shame about the damage to the wing but still a great photo Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A butterfly image to be proud of considering its high quality and impressive detail. Wolverine X-eye 04:31, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:43, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 20:08:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support: vivid. JayCubby (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nearly fifty megapixels - surely one of our highest resolution bird pictures. ISO 5000 means a little bit of noise at full size but when full size is this immense it doesn't matter at all. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support One of the most visually appealing images I've seen so far. Wolverine X-eye 04:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 08:15, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 16:42:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info Commissioned by Louis XIV in 1655 to en: Giovanni Francesco Romanelli, with all the ceilings of the summer apartment of the Queen Mother Anne of Austria, at the Louvre (waterfront gallery) for the Salle des Saisons or the salon of the summer apartmentː Inventory 20348 A and B, Louvre, Paris. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful and high quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Splendid. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Like others have already said, this is a marvelous piece of art. Wolverine X-eye 04:26, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 15:31:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info A Fijian endemic; on the islands of Vanua Levu and Taveuni. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice capture, I like that you captured some of the wing movement. However, I did add a 'birds in flight' category, you might want to consider using that in future nominations of flying birds. Cmao20 (talk) 16:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 10:55:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by Tisha Mukherjee -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition + quality Cmao20 (talk) 16:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 10:20:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Arecaceae_(Palms)
Info created by Lvova – uploaded by Lvova – nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - Shame the bottom is a bit distracting (between the greenhouse roof and other branches) but the overall composition is just too good to pass up. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Agree with @Chris Woodrich - While the image is great for the most part, the bottom is distracting. I added a note to the image with a suggested crop. — ERcheck (talk). 23:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Excellent picture (composition + motif) but there are large areas of blue chromatic aberration. FP to me if fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I didn't re-check after QI, but now big areas are fixed. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Purple CAs, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I propose to cut the bottom part and to make a square format --Llez (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 06:20:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Northeastern_Region_(Norðurland_eystra)
Info Eyjafjörður fjord during sunset. All by me -- Jakubhal 06:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Exquisite Cmao20 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The atmosphere in the air is almost tangible; it's like I'm there experiencing this stunning view myself. Incredible stuff. Wolverine X-eye 04:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 08:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive. Good handling of the contre-jour situation, great clouds and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 06:06:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info Empty shikara on Dal Lake, Srinagar, India. Created by Fulvio Spada – uploaded by Bodhisattwa – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support good quality with a painterly composition. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with nominator Cmao20 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Calm, peaceful composition where all the elements seem at equilibrium. Wolverine X-eye 04:43, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 04:15:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France
Info created & uploaded by Kent Wang – nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Junior Jumper (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice composition, wish I could support this. But lack of detail at full size and areas of obvious overexposure. Cmao20 (talk) 16:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 03:26:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae
Info Parrot gladiolus (Gladiolus dalenii) makes a splash of colour in the overcast monsoon in Ooty, high in the Nilgiris mountains, South India. Image shot hand-held outdoors; the background rendered black using Adobe Lightroom. There are no FPs of the 278 species in the genus Gladiolus. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Very nice, but sad that the lower flower is cropped. And also the sharpness could be better. We are spoiled with stacked images. -- -donald- (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @-donald-: I've changed the bottom crop to include the full flower. This was shot outdoors with wind and rain of the monsoon, hence slight lack of sharpness. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 06:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Cutout is incomplete. There is a green belt between some of the buds. I've marked it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Thanks for pointing this out.
Done Please review the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Bottom cutout is still a little ragged, but the other two look good. Supporting now on the assumption that it will be polished. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks for your meticulous reviews. --Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Thanks for pointing this out.
Weak oppose While I appreciate the effort to get this image, I am not really keen on the black background. I would much prefer a natural background. Combined with the fact that some parts of the image are a lot less sharp than others and sorry, it's not quite FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 20:56:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Halcyon
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good pose and colours. --Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful kingfisher overlooking what I assume to be water for any unsuspecting prey. Wolverine X-eye 03:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:32, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:19, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:07, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good posture, beautiful soft light and background. – Aristeas (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 18:39:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others
Info An exposed shale formation in Marble Canyon, Kootenay National Park, British Columbia, Canada. I think the interplay of geometry and colour gradation is quite attractive. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with nomination - attractive patterns and also a valuable depiction of a geological phenomenon. Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Might not seem like much to the average person but to a geologist or scientist this image is priceless and holds much significance. Wolverine X-eye 03:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose With a static subject like this, the left side should be just as sharp as the right.--Ermell (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:09, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 15:05:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Really cool, but I think the birds distract too much. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I removed the blurred birds in flight, some of them are on the structure. iMahesh (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very striking Cmao20 (talk) 19:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment The bottom crop seems arbitrary. Adjusting it along the lowest horizontal line would avoid cutting the figure. Otherwise, a good useful addition to the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Please check the alternate option below. iMahesh (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
- Comment: Alternate option with Bottom Crop adjusted. iMahesh (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support both, with a preference for this version. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support This crop is better, thanks. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree that the alternative is the better option. Wolverine X-eye 04:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Both versions are beautifully detailed, but both are too fragmented for me. They lack a bit of the surrounding. --Milseburg (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful building and an appealing clean composition. I like the birds. – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 15:01:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Zygaenidae (Burnet Moths)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - Awesome shot. Love the little ant just hiding at the bottom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition, good quality, appealing natural gradient in the background. Cmao20 (talk) 19:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely --B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support as with Cmao20. JayCubby (talk) 00:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Definitely wow! --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this composition; it's working really well. Wolverine X-eye 03:39, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very impressive and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 14:04:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail_tracks
Info Rail tracks in Ljubljana Train station, Slovenia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - The railing at the far left is somewhat distracting. Would the composition be better if the border only had the gravel (for example, by turning the far-left track straight using perspective correction)? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Chris Woodrich it would be better, but i needed digaonale since its more likeable. But it not just gravel, they is some grass too, i have similar, will see and check. I have to rotate to remove cars etc, so just tracks. --Mile (talk) 08:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support This picture has the effect of an optical illusion for me. When I focus on one set of tracks, the others seem to move in my peripheral vision. Anyway, I'm not sure whether the composition 100% works for me but I think it's a cool abstract idea. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Categories lacking, as usual. --A.Savin 10:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Amazing view, but the crop seems rather random. Not outstanding or stunning enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:33, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 08:29:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 08:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support (EXIF data would be nice.) --XRay 💬 09:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- @XRay: I've added EXIF metadata.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:02, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice subject and composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support There's clearly historical significance to this door as it seems rusty and old like typical abandoned architecture (not saying it's abandoned though). Wolverine X-eye 03:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 07:28:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info created by Anna.Massini – uploaded by Anna.Massini – nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Info Bust of Tommaso Crudeli, in the castle of Poppi - Tommaso Baldassarre Crudeli (Poppi, December 21, 1702 – Poppi, March 27, 1745) was an Italian poet and jurist. He is remembered as a champion of free thought. Crudeli was accused of heresy for having joined the first English Masonic lodge founded in Florence, and he was imprisoned and tortured for 15 months by the Inquisition Court in Santa Croce despite being seriously ill. Since he refused to sign confessions imposed upon him, he was convicted of heresy and placed under house arrest in Poppi, where he shortly died from the aftereffects of torture. The Grand Duke of Lorraine, having received a detailed report from Crudeli, decided to suspend the activities of the Inquisition in 1741, making it the first in the world. He subsequently closed and had the Court demolished. To overcome the outdated justice system and to purge it of numerous medieval legacies, on November 30, 1786, the "Reform of Tuscan Criminal Legislation" was enacted. This set of innovations later became known as the "Leopoldine Code," whose absolute novelty was the abolition of the death penalty. The Grand Duchy of Tuscany was therefore the first state in history to eliminate such an abominable judicial practice.
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Hi. I don't think that's enough for FP. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Yeah, I tend to agree this isn't a sufficiently outstanding picture to be FP. It is a nice motif but ultimately busts of this kind are not uncommon and this one does not have any distinctive artistic qualities, so it would need to be a really excellent photo to get to FP status. And, although the pic is a QI, I don't think it has the outstanding detail or composition that would be necessary for it to get a star. Cmao20 (talk) 11:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- It's true that there are many busts, but I proposed this one for its unique history, as the subject led to the abolition of the death penalty in Tuscany, the first state in the world to do so. I would find it reckless to ignore this fact. And that's why I consider it not just any bust, nor the same as those of figures who often merely started or fought wars. (⧼Anna Massini⧽) (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't want to impose my photos, but I argue that since these photos will end up on the front page of Wikimedia Commons, we should support photos, certainly beautiful, but that also have relevant content. (⧼Anna Massini⧽) (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Well, sure, but just because the subject is historically noteworthy does not mean that a depiction of him should be promoted regardless of the qualities of the image. That's more an argument for Valued Images. Cmao20 (talk) 19:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment When you add information to your file page, that is very good, but please make sure you do not break the formatting on it. I've fixed this for you now. Just remember to look at the page after you've clicked on "Save" too, to see that it's ok. --Cart (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- ok. Thanks. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination(⧼Anna Massini⧽) (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 04:44:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Caryophyllaceae
Info Seed pods of a Silene dioica. Focus stack of 40 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 06:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent image worthy of featured status. Wolverine X-eye 07:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Really nice light Cmao20 (talk) 11:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 17:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2025 at 23:01:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by Bjankuloski06 – uploaded by Bjankuloski06 – nominated by Bjankuloski06 -- B. Jankuloski (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Info (additional, updated): This is a bishop's private communion set, displayed in a casing on the wall of the main Anglican cathedral in Auckland. The side of the case facing us is enclosed with glass but I have managed to avoid the glass showing on the photo, at the slight expense of complete shaprness. I thought the image may be additionally interesting seeing that we normally get nature shots from New Zealand, and very rarely objects. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- B. Jankuloski (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support At first the colours on the text threw me, but then I realized that the capital letters (except for one "T") are a different shade entirely. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm probably biased because I find this a really interesting and beautiful set of items. It could be a bit sharper, but it's well-presented and the text is legible. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I could have achieved greater sharpness if it wasn't for the glass cover of this cabinet. Dealing with reflections was challenging in itself! B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I was about to comment it's fortunate there was no glass, for that would have ruined a lovely photo. Well done, you have my
Support! JayCubby (talk) 00:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- I was about to comment it's fortunate there was no glass, for that would have ruined a lovely photo. Well done, you have my
- Thank you! I could have achieved greater sharpness if it wasn't for the glass cover of this cabinet. Dealing with reflections was challenging in itself! B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2025 at 11:46:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Czech Republic
Info View of the castle and the village of Rabí located in Nature park Buděticko. Created by Suisant – uploaded by Suisant – nominated by Suisant -- Suisant (talk) 11:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Suisant (talk) 11:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice motif, soft and gentle light. Cmao20 (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:24, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
Support the wheat fields elevate the image. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:51, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful scenery, nice composition. I guess you could make even more of it by tweaking colour balance and contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 19:40:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Aulopiformes (Grinners)
Info Sauro lizardfish (Synodus lacertinus), La Paz, Baja California, Mexico. The Sauro lizardfish is native to the areas of eastern Pacific Ocean and is reef-associated in a common depth range of about 1–27 metres (3.3–88.6 ft). The maximum recorded length of the this lizardfish is 20 centimetres (7.9 in) but the average length is 15 centimetres (5.9 in). The Sauro lizardfish is recorded to live solitarily and not within a group. Note: there is only one FP of genus Synodus (a different species). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality, technically challenging shot Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Pez ángel real (Holacanthus passer), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, México, 2024-12-19, DD 25.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 19:02:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Pomacanthidae (Marine angelfish)
Info King angelfish (Holacanthus passer), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, Mexico. The king angelfish is a non-migratory tropical fish that inhabits reefs in the eastern Pacific Ocean from the coast of Peru north to the Gulf of California, generally at depth of 4–30 metres (13–98 ft). Adult king angelfish are generally about 35 centimetres (1.15 ft) in length. They are diurnal and feed on sponges, other sessile invertebrates, zooplankton, and certain species of benthic microalgae. Note: there are no FPs of the genus Holacanthus (including 7 species) on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support and cute fish --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 16:29:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Poland
Info High quality early morning photography of an important historical landmark in Kraków, Poland. No FPs of this place. created by Gswito – uploaded by Gswito – nominated by Cmao20
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Strong composition and excellent use of long exposure taken before sunrise. The soft, directional light enhances surface textures, while the light trail adds subtle dynamism. A technically and aesthetically refined image. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support a very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great light, good compo Poco a poco (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 12:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 14:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 16:28:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Lamiaceae
Info High quality focus stack; no FPs of this species of plant. created by Ermell – uploaded by Ermell – nominated by Cmao20
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:28, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:37, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Contre-jour here works perfectly. --Yann (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Quick comment though: EXIF data says focus stack of nine images, template says ten. Which is correct? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great, shows this little flower in all its delicate beauty. IIRC I asked you some years ago if you could take a focus stack photo of the Günsel; so thank you very much for granting me my wish ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 18:18, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think that was last year :-) --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:08, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination.--Ermell (talk) 22:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the best bokeh but still, great detail Poco a poco (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I am genuinely impressed by these flower shots. Wolverine X-eye 14:58, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Spondylus varius
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 15:54:17 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
Info In the members of the genus Spondylus (the "spiny oysters") the right valve is attached on a substrate (rocks, corals, etc). The region of the attachement is well visible on the valve. Often also the right valve is deeper, whereas the left one can be very flat; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent set. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent as usual Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 08:13, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 14:05:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Astronauts
Info created by Neil A. Armstrong, – uploaded by 0x010C, nominated by Yann
Support Surprisingly, this iconic picture is not yet featured. -- Yann (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Buzz Aldrin, the lunar module pilot, was the 2nd person to walk on the moon. This photo of Aldrin was taken by Neil Armstrong, who was the first (19 minutes before Aldrin). — ERcheck (talk). 15:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - — ERcheck (talk). 15:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- FYI@Yann, there is a higher resolution version at http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/data_a70/AS11/processed/AS11-40-5868.png
- It's far too large (200MB PNG) for me to easily open, but I'm fairly sure it's the same image.
- This is a striking photo, so
Support JayCubby (talk) 00:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby: Wow! Larger crop, much higher resolution! Yann (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:39, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2025 at 19:08:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info The Bank of America Building seen between contrasting tall downtown buildings in Baltimore, Maryland -- created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Very nice, but the highlights are blown on the white accents. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- I've knocked down the highlights. Acroterion (talk) 20:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Did you re-work it from scratch? The WB, perspective, etc. all changed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, knocking down the highlights in the jpg wasn't working, I had to go back to the raw file, so the perspective correction had to be a do-over. I was able to expand the frame a little. The color balance is probably truer than it was - it more closely matches the original jpg copy from that day - the sky was not quite so blue as the first version. Acroterion (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Did you re-work it from scratch? The WB, perspective, etc. all changed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- I've knocked down the highlights. Acroterion (talk) 20:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Clashing buildings come together into a harmonious and careful composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:04, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, but it isn't talking to me Poco a poco (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose What's the purpose of the buildings, at the right and at the bottom? Sorry, the composition doesn't work in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think it fits because the photo is cropped.-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 08:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reminds me on my similar photo, where is about architecture. But i put mosque as main and big part of picture. Here is a bit mix, its creative but i must fix eyes somewhere. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment the buildings at the bottom don't bother me, but the one on the right is a bit distracting. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- The intention of the shot's composition is to use the other buildings as framing devices and as contrasts to the ornateness of the BoA tower. Acroterion (talk) 13:02, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the reduction to parts of the buildings and the composition with different architectural styles. --XRay 💬 17:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very interesting composition of buildings in different styles and colours, developing an abstract beauty. (Cf. e.g. some artworks by Lyonel Feininger and the great New York photographs by his son, Andreas Feininger.) – Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2025 at 18:44:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta
Info A panoramic view of the Badlands Interpretative Trail outside the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Drumheller, Alberta, Canada. This image depicts several stops on the trail (marked by the guideboards), with some hikers for scale. Also a new type of environment; all of our Featured natural places for this province are in the Rockies. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support If I were to be picky, I'm not sure all the frames in this panorama are 100% sharp, but you do have the resolution to downsample and produce a sharp image that is still very high resolution. Composition is great. Cmao20 (talk) 21:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive panorama. Too bad the foreground isn't completely sharp.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose The view is IMHO just ok but when looking at it at full resolution I'm disappointed. Some frames are of lower detail as others (like the one on the very left) but overall detail is not convincing Poco a poco (talk) 07:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Wonderful panorama and composition, “weak” (sorry) considering the uneven resolution etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per others--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2025 at 16:55:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info: morning view of North Surin Island from a nearly pristine unnamed beach, Mu Ko Surin National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Is it just me, or do the colours feel washed out? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment A stunning view, but I agree that the colours seem too bluish/greenish (see the sand) and a bit too subdued; the contrast could be increased, too, as currently there is neither white nor black in the image. Please check this, this image really deserves some extra work. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Done: improved vibrancy, contrast, WB. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Something seems strange with the colors, I think they might be still too greenish. I would happily support a version that looks a bit more like Cart's version. Don't hesitate to ping me if you happen to upload a new version because the landscape is very nice -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't care about the muted colours, this is a sublime composition and although the sky is a bit dull, there is something pleasant about this soft light. Cmao20 (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support for the improved version. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice landscape but the colors are just not there. Washed out appearance, unnatural aspect -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:14, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I don't think saturation is the key here. Instead in this version, I have used de-haze, some color correction and light correction, plus desaturated what you added in your second version. Use it any way you like. --Cart (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is nice but I'm not so sure about the compo and the overall result does not make it one of our finest images Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2025 at 16:55:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea
Info: Unusual brightly-coloured crown-of-thorns starfish, Sirinat National Park, Thailand. No existing FPs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
--Yann (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Support
- I changed my vote. Yann (talk) 09:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: Could you explain why you changed your vote? Wolverine X-eye 13:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- After reading Poco, and seeing this: File:Acanthaster planci in Ko Tao, Thailand 1695.jpg. Yann (talk) 13:47, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- I changed my vote. Yann (talk) 09:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Rather low detail, WB is off, otherwise a decent shot. Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Detail looks fine to me given technical challenges. The white balance does look too blue to me though, compare to here. Cmao20 (talk) 21:35, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Done: WB improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:50, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not yet there, there is still a green hue Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- As you know, the substrate would not look neutral grey or white even at a shallow depth. And both of your current nominations have greenish tints. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good capture of this unusual underwater creature. Wolverine X-eye 13:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:17, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:44, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Finally no. Yann (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Tamarind Sapling with Rack Focus.jpg, not featured
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2025 at 09:05:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fabaceae
Info All by Saishna96
Support -- A tamarind sapling (Tamarindus indica) captured with rack focus and soft background blur. Saishna96 (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry but the plant is not in focus. --Espandero (talk) 15:24, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I know it's not nice when a picture is rejected but I have to agree with Espandero. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Nice idea to photograph the plant off centre like this, and I like the soft colours and the other saplings visible in the background. But sadly the plant is just not sharp enough for FP. Don't want to pile on opposes but this one is unlikely to pass. But please don't give up, the artistic sensibility here is good, just image quality not there Cmao20 (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2025 at 20:45:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
Info created by Survey of India, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support High resolution of a historical map, good quality reproduction, well preserved. Please note that it is now restricted at the source, so our copy is the only free one available on the Internet. -- Yann (talk) 20:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment This is a beautiful, high quality, detailed, historically significant, and educational map that I had planned on nominating in May this year. That was until I discovered a stitching error. I have marked it on the map (between 30 and 32 degree N latitudes.). It should be easy to correct, only needs the map to be moved upwards slightly at the stitch. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- @UnpetitproleX: I think I managed to fix that. It was not so easy, as the stitching is not parallel to the map border. I also uploaded the original map, so we can see the difference. Yann (talk) 11:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, good work. Not perfect but reasonably well-done, imo. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support high resolution documentation of an important historical map! —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support and many thanks to Yann for the repairing. – Aristeas (talk) 18:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2025 at 19:58:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Corvidae#Genus : Dicrurus
Info created by Ehsan Ali Biswas – uploaded by Ehsan Ali Biswas – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 19:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 19:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful colour composition --Tagooty (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment: seems rather underexposed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Lovely colours but agree with The Cosmonaut that it does appear to be underexposed. Compare to this which, while far too small for FP, has so much more detail on the feathers. A lot of the details here are lost. Cmao20 (talk) 21:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I actually like the rather dim light combined with the bright color of the background. Would've assumed it was shot at dusk if it weren't for the exif (which makes it clear that yes, it's a little underexposed, but the overall effect works for me). — Rhododendrites talk | 18:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a dark bird photographed without direct sunlight, I don't think it's (that much) underexposed and the background is outstanding -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per above—I would've liked it slightly less dark but still works for me. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2025 at 08:52:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cisticolidae_(Cisticolas)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by Tisha Mukherjee -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 09:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Good looking image, but there needs to be a gallery section. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, and the description is too bare bones plus the categories need to be improved. I helped you set up your previous nomination because you are new here, see this diff, but you must be able to get the information on your nominations up to FP standard yourself. Please take a look at what I did and match it for this nom too. An FP is not just about a pretty picture, it's also about having full photo documentation (see the rules). --Cart (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Can you please be more specific about the improvements of categories. Do you need me to add more categories to this image? If so please suggest. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- The sort of categories needed are written here on the nomination page, right above your photo: "Categories (what, where, who, when)". You can also follow the link to a full description at Categorization tips. Like I said, Please take a look at the categories and description I added on the file page of you on your other photo: File:Common Myna by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg. Use those as a guide to what categories and full description are needed. --Cart (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I think I got it. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The sort of categories needed are written here on the nomination page, right above your photo: "Categories (what, where, who, when)". You can also follow the link to a full description at Categorization tips. Like I said, Please take a look at the categories and description I added on the file page of you on your other photo: File:Common Myna by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg. Use those as a guide to what categories and full description are needed. --Cart (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Can you please be more specific about the improvements of categories. Do you need me to add more categories to this image? If so please suggest. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have added gallery section and I hope this is fine now. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 18:03, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, and the description is too bare bones plus the categories need to be improved. I helped you set up your previous nomination because you are new here, see this diff, but you must be able to get the information on your nominations up to FP standard yourself. Please take a look at what I did and match it for this nom too. An FP is not just about a pretty picture, it's also about having full photo documentation (see the rules). --Cart (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 08:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:03, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Too wide crop with uninteresting elements Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Was holding off until documentation was improved, but it's FP now, well done. Cmao20 (talk) 21:26, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good, and I really like the complex composition with the graphic beauty of the twigs. – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2025 at 18:15:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info The ramparts of Aigues-Mortes (Gard, France) are one of the most well-preserved 13th-century fortifications in France. Shot in morning light, I like the shape of the clouds aligned with the ramparts. Created, uploaded and nominated by Benjamin Smith -- Benji 18:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Abstain as creator -- Benji 18:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice light and I also like the way the shape of the castle mirrors the clouds, but I'm not convinced by other aspects of the composition, such as the traffic island in the foreground, or the modern car parked outside the gate further down. The quality is OK but somehow not as good as we might expect from this camera and I also think it's underexposed (looking at the histogram, there are almost no pixels above 85%). BigDom (talk) 12:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and light for me Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I really like the view and appreciate that it makes me remember a visit to Aigues-Mortes 20 years ago, but I have to agree with BigDom that the image seems underexposed (checked this on a calibrated Eizo ColorEdge monitor); the walls should brighter, the clouds almost white. – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per BigDom and Aristeas. Yann (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, it's underexposed and I'm not convinced either about the compo / POV, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Info New version, slightly brightened (but not too much as I believe it would make the morning light less attractive) --Benji 14:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Light is better, but I find the perspective distortion much too heavy. Yann (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the new version – definitely better. – Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2025 at 15:27:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good -- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very striking Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment EXIF nestane !? Od Galičica ubo se gleda. --Mile (talk) 19:45, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Чудно ми е и мене што ги нема метаподатоците. Не знам дали може некако да се вратат.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Ако имаш на некоа, можи да се вратат. Само преклај последна слика преко таа шо има оригинал ЕКСИФ на Фотошоп и Сахрани слика поново (дакле оверрајт). --Mile (talk) 10:12, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Додадов метаподатоци.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Looks fine but it lacks wow IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely image of a lovely place. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Да, вакви призори нема многу. --Mile (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2025 at 04:40:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Sur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, kanton Graubünden. Sculpture SunPunt - KlangBrúcke - 2024. Artwork by Klemens Cervenka & Christian Schwarzer. Switzerland is trying to connect art and nature in public outdoor spaces. This sculpture stands with many others along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden. The shapes of this artwork really appeal to me.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I see too orange in the picture. Is natural? --Ezarateesteban 12:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Agree that the white balance does look a bit warm to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Ezarate and Cmao20 *
Done. Correction WB. Thanks for your reviews. (note: sometimes it takes a while for the new version to be visible.)--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:58, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks way better Cmao20 (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Ezarate and Cmao20 *
Support Still seems a tad warm, but much better. (Without knowing what kind of wood the sculpture is made of, can't really say...) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- FYI: White balance adjusted slightly downwards--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Interesting but not really exciting Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Can't you enjoy the flowing forms of this wooden artwork by the artists Klemens Cervenka & Christian Schwarzer?--Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't really get the artwork either. It doesn't hold much appeal for me. I supported because of the strong image quality and because it is a good composition of a subject that does not appeal to me but nonetheless has value to document. Cmao20 (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2025 at 00:43:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
Info created by Evan-Amos – uploaded by Evan-Amos – nominated by Ryūkotsusei -- Ryūkotsusei (talk) 00:43, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ryūkotsusei (talk) 00:43, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support for documentation value, seems to fit well in the electronics gallery, though I think an even better quality image of this object is possible.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2025 at 22:22:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info created by Humberto Causa – uploaded by Zeroth – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support and I fixed the gallery for you. This is not a portrait. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 18 Jul → Wed 23 Jul Sat 19 Jul → Thu 24 Jul Sun 20 Jul → Fri 25 Jul Mon 21 Jul → Sat 26 Jul Tue 22 Jul → Sun 27 Jul Wed 23 Jul → Mon 28 Jul
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 14 Jul → Wed 23 Jul Tue 15 Jul → Thu 24 Jul Wed 16 Jul → Fri 25 Jul Thu 17 Jul → Sat 26 Jul Fri 18 Jul → Sun 27 Jul Sat 19 Jul → Mon 28 Jul Sun 20 Jul → Tue 29 Jul Mon 21 Jul → Wed 30 Jul Tue 22 Jul → Thu 31 Jul Wed 23 Jul → Fri 01 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.