User talk:Benlisquare

Important notice
This is my Commons talkpage. 这是我的个人COMMONS讨论页。
You may leave a message here, however since I do not visit Commons very often, it is highly likely that I will not receive your message for a long stretch of time. 我不会经常来COMMONS，所以我很有可能看不到你的信息。
Thus, it would be strongly preferable that you contact me at my English Wikipedia talk page if you are able to do so instead, so that I am able to swiftly reply to any queries. Additionally, if you have any urgent requests, feel free to contact me by email. 如果您有话讲，请到w:en:User talk:benlisquare留言。有紧急事情就给我发电子邮件。
If something is urgent, it would be important to contact me elsewhere; keep in mind that you have the burden of contact if there is a problem. 如果有重要事情，你有责任联系到我。 Thank you for reading. 感谢您的谅解。
日本語でおｋ、だがしかし、単純な語彙を使用してください。俺の日本語熟練は一寸駄目よ、ｗｗ。
See My English Wikipedia Talkpage.

Welcome

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Benlisquare!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Legobot^Operator_talk 01:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheng character

Hey Benlisquare, I got a vector version of the cheng character made, so I have put File:Zh cheng rare han.gif up for housekeeping deletion, since the vector version displays better at multiple sizes. Rjanag (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 13e2e130b0ace9fdb7215cf43e173660

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Qing map

I have seen a lot of Qing maps from different websites so far. They almost universally agree on the map (for the Qing Dynasty at largest extent), except for some outlier islands, especially the Sakhalin Island. The 1689 Sino-Russian Nerchinsk Treaty did not explicit mention this island. Also, unlike most other islands such as Hainan and Taiwan, Qing did not have military existence on the Sakhalin. Many English maps such as this do not consider it part of Qing territory, unlike some other maps (especially Chinese maps). A few days ago a Wikipedia user named Tobby72 insisted on replacing this map in the article stating that Sakhalin did not belong to Qing. He is partially right since there are indeed many sources suggesting so. In addition, there are almost no English Qing maps actually explicitly draw the Spratly Islands as part of Qing Dynasty (maybe part of Qing, and maybe not, but explicitly showing so is a POV). After that, I decided to NPOVify the map (showing dispute or avoid the dispute altogether). Thanks. --Hisacw (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 03:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, there is no need to further mention about that quality of that box in the corner. Despite this part (about the image quality), I found you actually held some similar views and decided to support you anyway. --Hisacw (talk) 18:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

本人是支持你的观点的，之前的讨论内容（其中包括不和谐的内容）当你看完后就已不需再保存，消除即可，并顺便善意地帮你改个笔误，“进场”->“经常”，但你却粗暴地全部回退。你没有必要使用那种态度重新制造对立。--Hisacw (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

我没有看到你上面帮我修改的地方，抱歉。我只是说你不因该把我talkpage上的留言给删除 - 我本人习惯就是最后把所有的留言给archive上(i.e.和我en.wikipedia的讨论页一样)。 -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 03:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

嗯，我明白你的意思了。前面删除我自己的留言的原因已向你解释。祝编辑愉快！--Hisacw (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

没问题。 -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 05:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gu Kaizhi 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gu Kaizhi 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Radiation Dose Chart by Xkcd.png

Hello
I see you corrected yourself saying the cc0 template looks better. But don't forget that Randal Munroe used the original cc0 licence, technically speaking. You can check it in the page he says he is waving copyright... Esby (talk) 17:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Media from Niconico

Thank you for everything! / 間違いを直してくださって、ありがとうございます。次から気をつけます。--Tkmkz (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

PD Australia item

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Westralia_secession_movement_meeting_1933.jpg - wanowandthen do not attribute anything on their website as to their sources of info - images or text. Just a forewarning that it will be up for deletion. sats (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Late reply, but this has been fixed. See image description. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 13:59, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

wanowandthen DO have an extensive list of references at http://www.wanowandthen.com/reading.html and images that are not our are ALWAYS credited where the source is known. The comment above is inaccurate at best and defamatory at worst.

Stop Chinese national POV pushing edits

Hi, Benlisquare. Please stop your Chinese nationalist POV pushing edit. This image was taken by the reporter of the Japanese Navy and published on the album of the Japanese Navy. They are soldiers of the Shanghai Special Landing Force. They were afraid of possible chemical attack by the Chinese Nationalist Army (There is no mention about whether the Chinese 29th Route Army used chemical weapon or not). Shanghai Special Landing Force is nothing but small garrison unit and they don't have chemical weapon. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source that affirms this? You have changed various descriptions on the English Wikipedia that have existed there since 2007; the source for your image also happens to be a BBS discussion board. Also, cease your ad hominem allegations, if you want to discuss something with me, do not behave like an elementary schoolkid and call me names. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 14:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

• Notice: Full discussion located at en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China#Problems relating to File:Japanese Naval Landing Force, waiting for attack order with wearing a gas mask.jpg. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 07:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

今天看到一个日军在南京施放毒气，因此士兵使用防毒面具的回忆：“听说是把1000名左右的中国人塞进电影院，往里边扔进毒气弹给杀死了。我也去看过，是个悬挂着很气派的牌子的相当大的电影院，位于市中心，是个很好的电影院，离16师团司令部很近。是把过路的人和俘虏抓了赶进电影院地下室的。因为有毒气弹，大家都说很危险，我想知道究竟，就去看了。战斗中是带着防毒面具的，虽然有了命令戴上，但直到南京都没在战斗中戴过。”(http://neverforget.sina.com.cn/h/2005-03-24/162656.html) 这个takabeg除了篡改照片说明，还用各种理由提删日军战争罪行的照片，对他要特别留意。--MtBell (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Natalia Poklonskaya fan art

	+1
	Thank you for helping to share Natalia Poklonskaya fan art with the world. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Licensing templates

Hello there. I wanted to point out something in the licensing templates you used for the Natalia Poklonskaya images. The format you should be using is {{CC-BY-SA-3.0|1=author name}} (see change I made). While the template doesn't look two different between the two, they categorize differently. Templates that begin with {{Self| are put into Category:Self-published work automatically, and they shouldn't be in that category. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that, and thanks for the notice. -- 李博杰  —Talk contribs 05:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Natalia Poklonskaya village pump discussion

Please see Commons:Village_pump#Basis_of_OTRS_tickets. It concerns some of the images that you uploaded onto Commons. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Derivative works from YouTube of Natalia Poklonskaya

The drawings of Natalia Poklonskaya are derivative works from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww9cBExFIiE and others listed on that YouTube page, I think. Parabolooidal (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely false and preposterous. Replied at Category talk:Artwork depicting Natalia Poklonskaya. --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 02:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Translation cantonese

Hello Benlisquare, can you help me a translate in cantonese please? Smitersleon (talk) 10:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Benlisquare, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

Kadı Message 18:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the talk page block. I was hoping to make a few clarifications.

1. I do not deny that I have made inappropriate edits to enwiki over the past few days, and I fully accept that the enwiki community considers these edits disruptive.
2. However, I have not made any edits to Wikimedia Commons since the enwiki indef block began, so I believe that the risk of me causing further cross-wiki disruption on Commons is very low, and that I am acting in good faith by restraining from making any edits at all.
3. Unless I continue to make disruptive edits, crosswiki or anywhere, I believe COM:NOTWP should apply in this circumstance - what happens on enwiki should be exclusive to enwiki; preventing me from contributing to Commons would affect my ability to contribute to the English Wiktionary and Chinese Wikipedia, which are my next most commonly-edited wiki projects.
4. You have also requested for a global block at meta:Steward requests/Global#Global lock for Benlisquare. I believe that this is excessive, since my contentious edits have been relegated to enwiki, and I have not caused any disruption elsewhere.
5. There was no prior warning for the Commons block, yet it is an indef block. I have made problematic edits, but the situation here feels excessive and unfair.
6. Blocks are supposed to be a preventative measure to prevent further disruption; per COM policy itself, blocks are not meant to be punitive.

I will not make an unblock request yet, but I will probably do so in a few weeks or months later. I am hoping that the avenue will still remain open for me, when the time comes. --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 20:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

@Benlisquare The global lock request was opposed by another admin, then withdrawn. Take some time to think over the other issues before making an unblock request. Brianjd (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

You are an old user, so I can comfortably expect that you are familiar with policies. Therefore, I did not consider warning necessary before the block. You know the block reasons and your uploads, please think a while, if your unblock request contains valuable arguments, I can remove the block after 3 months. Please think and understand blocking reasons in 3 months. Best, Kadı Message 13:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

@Kadı: What is this user blocked for? JPxG (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

@JPxG, Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Benlisquare for cross-wiki harassment, Islamophobia, and other policy violations Kadı Message 20:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Delete votes on files still used by you

You voted to delete the files in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Algorithmically-generated portrait art of a young woman with long blonde hair.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Algorithmically-generated art of a French maid teasing the viewer.png, even though those files are still used on your zhwiki user page.

As far as I am concerned, as long as the files are used there and you remain in good standing on that project, these files are ineligible for deletion except as copyright violations. I said so at the DRs. But your delete votes might override that. Can you clarify? Brianjd (talk) 07:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

The way I see it, whether or not an image is in-use within userspace doesn't have any bearing whether my images are COM:SCOPE or not, since even on zhwiki the userpage policy is "user pages should not be filled with excessive information unrelated to Wikipedia" (paraphrased); if they are used in articlespace or have potential to be realistically used on a non-Wikipedia Wikimedia project, then they fulfill COM:SCOPE. If users deem that the images fail COM:SCOPE and COM:PORN, then that should be the outcome, regardless of the zhwiki userpage usage; conversely, if users deem an image to be of good enough quality to keep even if it can't realistically be used anywhere in articlespace, I will also not oppose their decision. Perhaps, consider it a "weak delete" sort of !vote? I'd like to add that I have no interest in making any further edits on zhwiki until the discussion relating to my global block on meta is well and truly over, even if I am in good standing there. --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 09:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

COM:SCOPE#File in use in another Wikimedia project: The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. I can’t comment on zhwiki rules, but your user page there certainly does not look excessive by the standards of other projects I have seen.

But since you said you want to leave it to the community to decide the fate of these files, and you don’t want to edit zhwiki for now, I think we should just ignore the fact that these files are used on your zhwiki user page. I will add this information to the DRs.

I respect your request at enwiki to be left alone for now; I intend this to be my last edit to this page. Brianjd (talk) 09:28, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblocked

I have unblocked you per the discussion at COM:AN/U. In the meantime, I recommend that you don't do anything controversial and hope you can participate in the discussion to address the community's concerns about your AI-generated uploads. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Given recent events, I assure everyone that I will not be uploading any AI-generated content any time soon, and that I have completely lost interest in AI image generation. I promise to fully take in the feedback I have received over the past few days, and will put in 110% diligence to conforming with the conduct that is expected of me as a constructive contributor to Commons. I hope that past misdeeds can be left in the past, and while forgiveness is earned rather than given, I will aim to earn that forgiveness. --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 01:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Any chance you could make a guide for Wikimedia users on how to generate images using Stable Diffusion? Trade (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

於File:Republic of China (orthographic projection, historical).svg的嚴重錯誤

中華民國疆界在網際網路上被誤傳，這個版本的地圖就是誤傳的其中一個版本，中華民國宣稱整個帕米爾高原，而不是半個。其中的瓦罕走廊也是中華民國宣稱的部分，而地圖沒有明確表示。這些錯誤是很嚴重的，可能造成各種的誤解，維基百科做為百科全書是不可以使用這樣錯誤的地圖的。宣稱領土詳見：File:中華民國爭議領土-en.svg
由中華民國政府機構出版的地圖，請見：Template:55年中華民國全圖模板。
-- Lilauid (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@Lilauid: 我不在意您在這圖上把這些領土錯誤糾正了，如果您願意的話，可以上傳新文件版本，謝謝。這文件是我很久以前上傳的（2012年？），早都已經忘記這回事情了。--benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 09:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@Benlisquare 感謝閣下，敝人之後就會上傳新版本。-- Lilauid (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden, December 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sumida River viewed from Hamarikyu Gardens in winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asuka Langley Soryu cosplay at Comiket 105 (close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taxi approaching the onramp towards Metropolitan Expressway Inner Circular Route.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The taxi is sharp and nice. I would have preferred a tighter crop --ArildV 05:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kana Arima cosplay at Comiket 105 (close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 08:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drone panorama of Mount Togakushi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qantas Airbus A330 (VH-EBJ) taking off from SYD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The airplane is very sharp, despite the challenging light condition. Well taken, and a good picture in the sunset light, imho. --Harlock81 17:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art (taken with 85mm DG DN).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drone panorama of Mount Atago from the south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drone panorama of Mount Maya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huilan Pavilion at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 70D on wall at Penglai Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lukas Raich 15:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cockpit window of Qantas Boeing 737 (VH-VYE) taxiing prior to takeoff at SYD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drone panorama of Mount Hiei from the southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drone panorama of Kobe and Osaka Bay Area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dr. Thomas Liptak 15:48, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikari Tachibana cosplay at Comiket 105 (alternate pose).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xiaomi SU7 with Tianjin plates, lower angle from front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:35, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevrolet Corvette (C7) at Okubo Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Strubbl 22:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiaoning Viaduct in Qingdao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:42, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aftermath of day 1 of Comiket 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --YikyuenG 16:09, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air traffic control at Beijing Daxing International Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Strubbl 13:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitajukken River at night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PLA Naval Museum main building, rear view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queueing for day 2 of Comiket 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
PLA Naval Museum, view from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

• Hello, could you please clarify what you mean by that? Do you mean adding the orientation to the file description? Thanks, --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 07:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment The building can be seen from several different places: North, South, from above... you have to add to the scope the direction of orientation, or the place from which the image was taken.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

• Oh, I understand now. Added to the scope. --benlisquare_{Talk•Contribs} 09:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hongqi H9 with Shandong plates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camellya cosplay at SMASH 2025 (part 4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:47, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)