Jump to content

User talk:Multichill

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:BotMultichill)
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Nutshinou in topic Notification about possible deletion
Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

File:Khalifa royals - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg

[edit]
File:Khalifa royals - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Konons_family_fresco

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Konons family fresco has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


186.175.224.93 02:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:West Bengal campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Campaign banner - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg

[edit]
File:Campaign banner - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Kawanabe Kyōsai - White-Robed Kannon - 14.76.61.1 - Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thyj (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Matthew Harris Jouett - Richard Mentor Johnson - NPG.83.11 - National Portrait Gallery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Follow up on US PD SDC by CuratorBot

[edit]

Hi. From User talk:DaxServer/Archive 2#CuratorBot adding incorrect copyright statements, I've applied the fix to the bot and running the fixes atm. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@DaxServer: thanks for picking this up. Multichill (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bot adding data with future dates

[edit]

Hi. This File:Murales-valencia garage.jpg image was uploaded on March 10 2024. The next day, March 11 2024, Multichill bot added structured data, including a date 22 March 2024, that had not yet come https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMurales-valencia_garage.jpg&diff=859489766&oldid=859439830 . Obviusly, regardless of the Exif data, which depend on the settings of the camera or device with which the file was created, a file can't be created after its upload. Shouldn't bots refrain to add future dates, or, at least, add a warning when Exif data are seen to be incorrect? Javier ME (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Javierme: the bot just extracts it from the wikitext. Upload date and exif are not used. The only checks if it's a valid date (if the Wikibase API is able to parse it). It was uploaded with the upload wizard, that should probably throw a warning about the data being in the future. Multichill (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Geographicus files

[edit]

Hi, A lot of files were uploaded from Geographicus with incomplete license (only PD-Art), e.g. File:1884 Bradley Map of Montana, Wyoming and Idaho - Geographicus - MTWYID-bradley-1884.jpg. Would it be possible to fix these? I have already fixed many manually, but it is a pain. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: back in the day (in 2011) we just used {{PD-Art}}. Updating that is quite tricky. Not sure if this can be automated. Multichill (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

JayCubby (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:British (English) School - Sir John Norris (1547^–1597) - 129774 - National Trust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Juiste sjabloon

[edit]

Hoi Multichill,

Ik was wat bestanden uit het Stadsarchief Rotterdam aan het nalopen, en veel van hun bestanden zijn geupload als CC-0 waar ze eigenlijk als PD-old gelicenseerd moeten zijn, zoals bijvoorbeeld File:1920 Portret van mr. Wynand Adriaan Mees, kassier en makelaar in assurantiën.jpg. Ik worstel even met het juiste sjabloon: als ik {{PD-old}} gebruik zegt het sjabloon dat ik ook de licentie voor de VS toe moet voegen, en gebruik ik {{PD-old-expired}} dan zegt hij dat het bestand is gepubliceerd in de VS voor 1930. Het Stadsarchief Rotterdam heeft een mix van bestanden beschikbaar onder PD, deels omdat de fotograaf overleden is, deels omdat de (onbekende) fotograaf bij een van de plaatselijke kranten werkte en de afbeelding meer dan 70 jaar geleden is gepubliceerd. Welk licentiesjabloon kan ik daar het beste voor gebruiken? Ciell (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ciell, misschien is dit sjabloon geschikt? {{PD-old-auto-1996}}. Ik zag dat zij Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universeel gebruiken in Rotterdam. Groet Peli (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hey @Pelikana, bedankt voor het meedenken. PD vanwege ouderdom is in ieder geval correct: ik worstel met wat er *in* onze sjablonen hier staat. {{PD-old-70-expired}} lijkt een duo-sjabloon die twee verschillende situaties dekt: zowel alle landen met PD wetgeving voor 70 jaar of minder na het overlijden van de maker, alsook (en? of? en/of? geen idee wat het werkelijk betekent!) foto's die in de USA in het PD gekomen zijn vóór January 1, 1930. Dat is toch verwarrend...?
Die welke jij voorstelt, {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, stelt in voorwaarde #3 dat de afbeelding met dat sjabloon gepubliceerd is in het eigen land voor 1926 (opmerking 3, URAA = 1996-70 jaar = foto was al in het publiek domein in 1926.). Dat is in dit geval ook niet van toepassing, meen ik - de afbeeldingen uit het Rotterdams Archief zijn uit de jaren 1930 en 1940.
Het kan ook aan mij liggen hoor, maar ik zit hier echt even in de knoop. Ciell (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
File:G.A.C. Smith - Pot met hyacinten - R13570 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:J.S. van der Stok - Stilleven met eieren - XN2445 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:L.A. Adriaans - Zwart - Blokken - Tw. in blauw - BK48810 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:A.F.E. van Rossum - P.V. structuur op dubbel stramien - BK3280 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:G. Bartey - Anemonen - XN1668 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Zwaantina Theodora Johanna Hiethaar - Het dienstmeisje - BK97175 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:A.J. Leemhuis - Ruit I - BK66805-A - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:G. van Bakel - Autaar - BK21591 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Onbekend - - - XN1506 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Onbekend - - - XN1942 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 09:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Monogrammist D.F. - Gezicht op het Palazzo Ducale in Venetië - R62 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 13:06, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Onbekend - Portret van een man - C2208 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Onbekend - Diana en Actaeon - C681 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Onbekend - Portret van een vrouw - C2209 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Adding SDC by BotMultichillT

[edit]

Hello @Multichill, While adding structured data to the uploaded media files, could you please add the Wikidata item of the creator if it is available, instead of using the somevalue placeholder? ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 16:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

iNaturalist2Commons

[edit]

Hoi Multichill, Kan je misschien helpen met dit issue? Ik zag je naam namelijk staan als interface admin.

Het gaat om het editten van deze pagina. Met deze inhoud Het zou dan deze diff moeten opleveren. groetjes,

Rudolphous (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Je zou de pagina ook kunnen wijzingen in:
// Forwarding this script to load the maintained version from User:Rudolphous
mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rudolphous/inat2commons.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');
Dan host ik de file vanaf nu.
Rudolphous (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
File:Francesco Guardi - Santa Maria della Salute - 2015.19.29 - Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 01:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Old Danish maps

[edit]

Hi! If you have a little time you are very welcome to read and comment at Commons:Batch uploading/historiskekort.dk. I have tried my first batch upload and would appriciate it if you could tell me if I'm on the right track. MGA73 (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pay attention to copyright
File:Unknown artist - Andrea Mantegna (c.1431–1506) - NG2250 - National Gallery.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is photo of a bust, not a 2-dimensional work, therefore PD-Art does not apply here.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Howardcorn33 (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Norfolk,_England

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Norfolk, England has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Enyavar (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bernadette Schugg

[edit]

Hallo Multichill, ich glaube, ich habe heute ein großes Durcheinander fabriziert, als ich eigentlich nur die Category:Bernadette Schugg erstellen wollte. Nun gibt es zwei: Bernadette Schugg und Category:Bernadette Schugg. Kann man dieses Problem geheben? Oder soll ich beide löschen und neu anfangen? (Der Fotograf ist benachrichtigt und schickt in Kürze seine Lizenzfreigabe.) Pacsolis (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Multichill, jouw bot makte een verkeerde combinatie van inventarnummer van het Mauritshuis met Rijksmuseum. Ik heb het corrigeert. Misschien kan je jouw bot voor het allgemeen corrigieren, als die dat nog steeds doet. Oursana (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Józef Chełmoński - Whipper-in - MP 4866 MNW - National Museum in Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gower (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Cali, Colombia July 2, 2025

Dear Sir or Madam Technical Support Department WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Email: info-commons@wikimedia.org

On July 1, 2025, I submitted the following request through my user account on the Wikimedia Commons platform:

Add category to approximately 374 uploaded files by user Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira

[edit]

Hello. I have uploaded approximately 374 JPG image files between June 30 and July 1, 2025 under the user account User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira. These images belong to four research documents about Adolfo Aristizábal Llano and the Hotel Aristi (Cali, Colombia). I kindly request that a bot or administrator adds the following category to all approximately 374 files: Category:Adolfo_Aristizábal_Llano_and_Hotel_Aristi_Archives_(Cali,_Colombia) • Most of the files were uploaded between 2025-06-30 and 2025-07-01 • File types: .jpg only • Uploaded by: User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira • Language of filenames: name begins with 4 numbers (for example; the number of a year, like 2022), then a dash, followed by 3 numbers (for example; 001), then a dash followed by 3 numbers (for example; 155), then text in Spanish (some include references to Cali, Hotel Aristi, or Adolfo Aristizábal) • The user grants permission for categorization by bot Thank you very much for your assistance. --Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I would appreciate it if you could kindly confirm whether this request has been properly received by your technical team, and provide an estimated date by which it may be processed.

Sincerely, Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira Mobile: +57 315 551 7078 Email 1: jaristialvira@gmail.com Email 2: jaristialvira@outlook.com

HOTEL ARISTI-FUNDADOR ADOLFO ARISTIZABAL LLANO-INFORMATION-PHOTOS-FILES-CATEGORY ADDITION-WIKIMEDIA COMMONS-JUL 1 2025

[edit]

Cali, Colombia July 2, 2025

Dear Sir or Madam

Technical Support Department
WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
Email: info-commons@wikimedia.org

On July 1, 2025, I submitted the following request through my user account on the Wikimedia Commons platform:

Add category to approximately 374 uploaded files by user Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira

[edit]
Hello. I have uploaded approximately 374 JPG image files between June 30 and July 1, 2025 under the user account User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira. 

These images belong to four research documents about Adolfo Aristizábal Llano and the Hotel Aristi (Cali, Colombia). I kindly request that a bot or administrator adds the following category to all approximately 374 files: Category:Adolfo_Aristizábal_Llano_and_Hotel_Aristi_Archives_(Cali,_Colombia) Most of the files were uploaded between 2025-06-30 and 2025-07-01 File types: .jpg only Uploaded by: User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira Language of filenames: name begins with 4 numbers (for example; the number of a year, like 2022), then a dash, followed by 3 numbers (for example; 001), then a dash followed by 3 numbers (for example; 155), then text in Spanish (some include references to Cali, Hotel Aristi, or Adolfo Aristizábal) The user grants permission for categorization by bot Thank you very much for your assistance.

--Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I would appreciate it if you could kindly confirm whether this request has been properly received by your technical team, and provide an estimated date by which it may be processed.

Sincerely,

Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira
Mobile: +57 315 551 7078
Email 1: jaristialvira@gmail.com
Email 2: jaristialvira@outlook.com Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Looks like 999real already did the requested categorization, but at least some images are incorrectly tagged as having been created by Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira — f.i. thisphoto. -- Tuválkin 17:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your time and effort on our behalf. How may I see the photo you have mentioned? 2800:484:807D:1400:DD03:CABA:8734:C3E1 17:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Category discussion warning

Images from the Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed higher resolution available has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Vysotsky (talk) 22:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category discussion warning

Images from RCE by subject not ready to substitute has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Vysotsky (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hoe krijg ik Camera location automatisch bij mijn fotos ?

[edit]

Ik wil bij een flink aantal fotos graag dat ze op OpenStreetMap verschijnen en dat gaat via Camera Locaton denk ik. Vroeger ging dat automatisch. HOe krijg ik dat voorelkaar ? In de Metadata zit bijna altijd GPS informatie.


File:Neretva Rogotin Ploçe Podgradina 16 43 28 607000.jpeg


This bot runs daily on Wikimedia Commons and creates

Camera location0° 00′ 00″ N, 0° 00′ 00″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

templates using the data found in the EXIF headers of newly uploaded files. JakobHosp (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@JakobHosp: I think User:DschwenBot used to do that. That bot broke down in 2022. I see several topics about that at User talk:Dschwen. I guess it was never replaced? That's a pity. Multichill (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JakobHosp: I guess this bot was no longer needed as the Upload Wizard add this based on the EXIF data. I don't know why your Wiki Uploader iOS application v. 1.2.3 does not add the location. Maybe you could consider using an other uplaod method, like Upload Wizard. HenkvD (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Such a bot would still be useful. The Upload Wizzard adds coordinates based on EXIF but Wikishootme doesn't. Pere prlpz (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I guess it should be two steps:
  1. Identify images that have coordinates in EXIF and tag these with {{GPS EXIF}}
  2. Extract GPS from EXIF, but it in structured data and replace {{GPS EXIF}} with {{Location}}
For finding images we'll probably need different strategies like monitoring recent changes and scanning a database dump.
Mediawiki already extracts EXIF and exposes that in the API so should be possible to do this without having to download all images. Multichill (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Works the Upload Wizard under Iphone SE2022 ? V1.2.3 works so nice as it remembers which photos are already uploaded. And i just dont get it becasue on WikiMap - Media with GPS EXIF the photos are nice on the map. Is it possible to extrat the GPS data from this map ? The main problem is i get the data in Mintues and seconds in stead of decimals JakobHosp (talk) 19:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I see that in the API the GPS coordinates are decimal. That is excellent as LOCATION needs that. Now it is may be less work than i thought, but autmatically will be less error prone and less work.
{ "name": "GPSLatitude", "value": 43.50926944444444 }, { "name": "GPSLongitude", "value": 16.43755277777778 }, JakobHosp (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JakobHosp: made a quick proof of concept to tag files. That seems to work.
Next step is to extract the coordinates. I recall that being a bit more tricky because we also might need to add the heading. Multichill (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the work. Would be very nice if it would work again. JakobHosp (talk) 08:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

0,0 coords

[edit]

if your bot can tell that the coords are very close to 0,0 like File:(20240727) Nederland 03.jpg it should add {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}} instead. RoyZuo (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Would be even better if you don't add invalid coordinates in the EXIF. First step is to tag with {{GPS EXIF}}. Some bot will later replace it with {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}}. Multichill (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
it comes with cameras, when they sometimes malfunction, not what i or most lay users can control or pay attention to. duh? RoyZuo (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Source categories (flat list)

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Multichill/Archives/2023/December#c-RZuo-20231201193200-Source_category

still 143 pages which i dont think belong there, since 2023. RoyZuo (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Nutshinou Talk! 16:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Nutshinou Talk! 16:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply